User talk:Human

Archives for this talk page:  , (new)

See the history of vandalism to this article

Hey goobers, it's my talk page!

Just so's you all know, I have a distinct preference for continuing conversations on the talk page they start on. Otherwise my aging brain hurts!

My to-do list is here.

As a confirmed mustard jar for taking on this job as a Sysop on RationalWiki: I pledge to only block users if they ask for it, or insert unfunny vandalism. I furthermore pledge that if I indulge in secret private conversations about you, we will make a formal report to the mob. Is that all? If you impugn my motives without warrant, or challenge my "AUTHORITY", er, there is nothing I can or will do.

vandalize

GdlessLiberal 22:16, 31 October 2007 (EDT)

It sure does. Nice to see you back :) human 23:09, 31 October 2007 (EDT)

Speaking of that, can I be a sysop again? ΓδλεσςΛιβεραλ 14:47, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

Of course. human 14:51, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

Just in time; we need to start creating some content to that NT and Bodhan don't become the sole purpose of the site.--PalMD^{-If it looks like a donut, eat it} 14:52, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

"Content"? What's that? human 14:54, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

When I am made the ruler of this site, you will be banned for that. Bohdan 14:55, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

Thanks, human. Bohdan, my powers are at your disposal. ΓδλεσςΛιβεραλ 14:55, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

Oh noes!!! flees the coming armagoatdon human 15:02, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

In attempt to undermine Bohdan's future reign _{And bring about my own} I hereby request Cratship, and anything else that you can throw in. Locke ^{Always Watching......} 15:17, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

I thought you already were, Pinto bean guy. Did you get to play with the tools and have them taken away after the fun was over? human 17:57, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

No, I never was a Crat. Locke ^{Always Watching......} 18:00, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

Of course, doh, I was mixing it up with syslopness. Oh well. human 18:03, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

The 'vaporize' tab makes it a lot more tempting to delete stuff... it just sounds so much cooler! I'm going to go create random stuff and delete it. ΓδλεσςΛιβεραλ 18:22, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

Thank u...

...for the compliment. | DINESEN^yep? 01:22, 4 November 2007 (EDT)

You are fully welcome. human 01:31, 4 November 2007 (EST)

Red Links

Is there a way to find articles that have loads of redlinks? I'm envisioning a list of pages sorted by number of redlinks in descending order. Sort of like a reverse Wanted Pages. That might be an efficient way of going after them, and also of tracking down serial redlink-creators for horsewhipping goatwhipping.--Bayes^update 16:18, 6 November 2007 (EST)

Here162.82.215.199 16:20, 6 November 2007 (EST)

Wanted pages shows a list of non-extant pages that are linked to. I'm thinking of a list of extant pages sorted by the number of redlinks that they contain.--Bayes^update 16:34, 6 November 2007 (EST)

Yeah, I know what you mean - a gold mine list. I try to find them by following "odd" entries on the wp list - scored two gems today, one a subpage of hoji's (it's his cp page, unedited, so it's full of links that don't work), and the awful New World Order page, which I removed, I swear, a hundred links from today. (wp went from 905 to 770 in the last couple hours...). But there ought to be a way to do what you suggest. I just don't know how. So I'd suggesting asking Trent and/or Linus, they have more skills, especially on back end stuff, which might be required.