Talk:Biblical literalism

From RationalWiki

An interesting start AKjeldsen. Are you going to be developing this article?--Bob_M (talk) 07:22, 30 July 2007 (CDT)

Yes, I'll keep working on it, but feel free to contribute. I was thinking of using the wp:Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy as a starting point for an analysis of the inerrancy position, and otherwise work through the different possible points of refutation of literalism - scientific, theological, social, etc. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 07:44, 30 July 2007 (CDT)

EDIT: A brief overview of how the different major denominations view literalism/inerrancy would probably be a good thing as well. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 07:46, 30 July 2007 (CDT)

Good.  :-) I think it would be great if we (RW) could at least aim for a more unified position on this one.--Bob_M (talk) 07:50, 30 July 2007 (CDT)

I've tried to sharpen up the definitions a little as I was finding them confusing. --Bob_M (talk) 14:19, 2 August 2007 (CDT)

As of right now the last couple of paragraphs don't seem to fit the tone well, especially the stuff about IQ, which is an uncited, mean spirited attack. I tried to clean them up a bit, and removed a lot of random red links, but it's going to take more work to integrate them, I think. human^{be in} 17:33, 30 August 2007 (CDT)