Talk:Body mass index
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Um, why? - User
- Mission? Fun? Delete?--Bobbing up 06:22, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- Hmm, drive-by mission tag. Actually I think the growing consensus is that the BMI is an inaccurate measure and was probably a poorly thought out idea in the first place. I would be considered obese on the BMI but if you met me you would say I was overweight at all. With work it could be a good article turn it over to PalMD to look at. - User 06:10, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- It's a medical, therefore scientific issue. It's also related to obesity, which has some controversy around it. Essentially, it's background infomation to something that is indeed on mission and I think it's essential that we have such things; not to compete with Wikipedia but for the sake of completeness so that RW doesn't have to rely on Wikipedia. ArmondikoVpostate 06:37, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- Hmm, drive-by mission tag. Actually I think the growing consensus is that the BMI is an inaccurate measure and was probably a poorly thought out idea in the first place. I would be considered obese on the BMI but if you met me you would say I was overweight at all. With work it could be a good article turn it over to PalMD to look at. - User 06:10, 22 December 2008 (EST)
Merge relevant content into obesity & then delete this? WěǎšěǐǒǐďMethinks it is a Weasel 20:26, 22 January 2009 (EST)
- Merged and redirected. ħuman 21:14, 22 January 2009 (EST)