Talk:Nag Hammadi texts
From RationalWiki
That's a lot of stubs to write to fill those red links Totnesmartin.--Bobbing up 17:33, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
- one day. Seeing as my knowledge of the individual texts wouldn't cover a gnat's whisker, some may well stay red for a while. Hmm, Hypostasis of the Archons - wasn't that a Star Trek spin-off novel? Totnesmartin 18:34, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
- Mmmm. I rather suspect they will stay red until the next de-redding purge. :-) --Bobbing up 11:39, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
- Or until we get someone who's as interested in the NH texts as me, but actually knows something about them. During the meanwhile, they're good for making people go "uh?" while going through Wanted Articles. We could call them the Nag of 46. Totnesmartin 11:46, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
- My bet is that they get deredded before one of our frequent Nag Hammadi experts visits again and decides to write 46 articles. Want to bet a beer on that?
--Bobbing up 11:54, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
- Curse those elusive Nag Hammadi experts! Never around when you need one. :-/ --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 11:56, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
- Well looks like User:TomMoore took exception to the poor reds and just wiped them out! Poor things.--Bobbing up 12:52, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
- Curse those elusive Nag Hammadi experts! Never around when you need one. :-/ --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 11:56, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
- My bet is that they get deredded before one of our frequent Nag Hammadi experts visits again and decides to write 46 articles. Want to bet a beer on that?
- Or until we get someone who's as interested in the NH texts as me, but actually knows something about them. During the meanwhile, they're good for making people go "uh?" while going through Wanted Articles. We could call them the Nag of 46. Totnesmartin 11:46, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
- Mmmm. I rather suspect they will stay red until the next de-redding purge. :-) --Bobbing up 11:39, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
