Talk:Sodomy

From RationalWiki

We also have a Sodomite page, which AmesG really should get off his ass and help finish.--PalMD^{-yada yada} 19:28, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

Perhaps we can rename the Sodomite page into the Sodomy page a wrap the contents together into a nice big package of perversion (non judgemental perversion).--PalMD^-Goatspeed! 20:51, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

Oh, why not have two big fat juicy packages of perversion? Sodomy is the act, and Sodomites are the lucky bastids who perform them. human^{be in} 21:00, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

I guess you can never really have too much sodomy.--PalMD^-Goatspeed! 21:05, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

Amen CЯacke®

For teh recordz, Ames did the sodomite page, like Pal wanted him to.-αmεσ (!) 21:51, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

You make that sound so... dirty... human^{be in} 00:38, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

[edit] On a more serious note...

I don't see anything that could be put in this article as opposed to the much higher quality Sodomite article. This article has an irreverent tone, so I propose moving this article's content to the Fun namespace (and moving the Sodomite article to this title.) Pear 23:20, 20 July 2008 (EDT)

Well, were we to move it to fun we could have a lot more fun with it. -- Gen. S.T. Shrink ^{Now where did I put that Boeing..} 23:07, 20 July 2008 (EDT)

I don't really see a problem with having both articles in the main space. ħuman ^sap 23:53, 20 July 2008 (EDT)