Template talk:Kenquote

Gentlemen! I will agree your precious automobile, enabling me to destroy '"`UNIQ--choose-00000001-QINU`"' on the <!--LINK'" 0:1-->. You should all be incarcerating over Operation <span style="text-transform:capitalize">centrifuge</span>, which will likely give <!--LINK'" 0:2--> a top result on a certain <!--LINK'" 0:3-->.^{Warning: NSFW Image!} Gentleman Aschlafly,

It does seem to me that your replies to my comment are slightly amusing. Regarding feminism and deception, you fail to realize that a major online Christian conservative newspaper is very interested in regards to Conservapedia's Atheism article. In fact, by the time you've finished reading this, it is likely the pearl-clutching pansies at RationalWiki will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Gumball Machines is gathering steam!!! Full steam ahead! Sincerely,

Conservative

"Conservative" (obviously your parents were unbelievers to give you such a pagan name), I'm sure you are also against classroom prayer and homeschooling, just like Hitler. I wasted time with your unsubstantial additions and you claim that faith isn't an uniquely Christian concept, so regardless, I'm so confident that you're here to do harm to family values. Open your mind and admit that the Bush doctrine helps resist gun control. Nobody seriously doubts that ideas do have consequences and do cause harm. Why does the likelihood of Obama's being a Muslim bother you and other liberals so much? --aschlafly 00:57, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Gentlemen! I will toast your precious aerodynamic, enabling me to destroy evolutionism on the internet. You should all be disintegrating over Operation domino, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

Mr Schlafly,

User: Conservative still has multiple working sock accounts despite your so-called "permaban"! your comments in regards to the death of evolutionism on the internet are unsurpassedly ridiculous. As per homosexuality and Google search rankings, you fail to realize that Richard Dawkins refused to debate a creationist. In fact, by this time next year, it is likely Atheism will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Grassroots is gathering steam!!! I am pleased to announce that I just sent out 24 emails.

Sincerely,

Newton

"Conservative" (if that is your real name), let me guess. You're a liberal, right? I've managed to read your rants and you seem to believe that the Romans had the concept of "truth", so I'm confident you're wrong. Furthermore, you deny that capital punishment prevents language devolution. The answer to your silly question is this: Wikipedia is a like a 3rd grade essay contest that gives points for more words. I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone like you.--Andy Schlafly 19:22, 4 March 2009 (EST)

What happened?

Why is this a redirect to Fun:Ken Quote Generator? It should be the "portable" version for polluting talkpages, with no red box, etc. ħuman 16:26, 5 March 2009 (EST)

I did it that way because when you transclude it like that, the options for inputting things don't work anymore. Obsoive:

{{kenquote|This should be in the lead text}}

Gentlemen! I will deconstruct your precious Playstation 2, enabling me to destroy Richard Dawkins on the internet. You should all be zapping over Operation hose, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

This should be in the lead text

I find your comments in regards to Machismo are less than surprising. Speaking of Penn Jillette and suicide, you fail to realize that what happened to atheism on the internet is going to happen to evolution. In fact, by tomorrow, it is likely RationalWiki will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Persona-non-Grata is gathering steam!!! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! Sincerely,

Conservative

--Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 20:17, 5 March 2009 (EST)

PS: What I mean to say is, having it as a redirect allows inputting the simple {{kenquote}} as opposed to the lengthy {{fun:Ken Quote Generator}}, but still allowing the optional user inserted text that Theemperor originally built in. Just transcluding it only allows one to place it on talk pages without the hotpink border. The way TE set up the actual page, the box and what not would not be included when redirecting--Ken Quote Generator is actually set up like a template in and of itself. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 20:25, 5 March 2009 (EST)

Ah, ok, I get it now. Feel free to revert my error if you haven't already! Oh, and can the random image be included, at least optionally? {{Kenquote|Kels|image=on}}? ħuman 20:38, 5 March 2009 (EST)

I've now got it so the image displays (it had been placed before the </noinclude>), and I've set it up so it can be turned off. You'd have to input it like this: {{kenquote|kenpics=}}, which would yield:

Gentleman Human

I found your comments in regards to Machismo are utterly lacking any cogent rebuttal. Concerning evolutionary racism and domestic violence, you gloss over that that time will certainly tell the story of what ultimately occurs. In fact, by the first quarter of the calendar year of 2013, it is likely RationalWiki will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Flying Fortresses is gathering steam!!! Señor Gringo Ateo Militante, American atheism is doomed! Olé! Olé! Olé! Sincerely,

A user of the Conservative account

--Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 20:51, 5 March 2009 (EST)